UKIAH, CA., 10/19/26 — A campaign mailer says Ukiah’s three City Council incumbents “voted to give themselves a 73% pay increase.” Mayor Susan Sher calls it “plain and simple, a hit piece containing misleading accusations and crucial omitted information.”
The mailer was paid for by Rescue California Coalition, a political committee based in Escondido. On Oct. 9, the committee got $5,000 from Ukiah businessman Ross Liberty. It reported the donation to the state the next day.
On Oct. 12, the committee spent $1,907.33 on a mailer against each incumbent: Sher, Juan Orozco and Mari Rodin. That’s $5,721.99 in all. The committee reported the spending to Ukiah City Clerk Kristine Lawler on Oct. 13. It used the state form for spending a group does on its own, without working with a candidate.
Liberty listed himself on the state report as a welder at Factory Pipe. He founded and owns the company. He’s also been a leading opponent of the city’s plan to annex land.
The mailer shows photos of the three incumbents. Under them are check marks for a “water rate increase,” a “sewer rate increase” and a “parks and recreation fee increase.” It says they “are nickel and diming Ukiah residents, while raising their own pay by 73%.” For sources, it lists council minutes from four meetings between February 2024 and June 2026.
What the record shows
The pay figure matches city records. In February 2024, the council voted 5-0 to raise its pay from $490 a month to $850, starting after the November 2024 election. Sher, Orozco and Rodin all voted yes. That’s a 73% raise. A city staff report says it was the council’s first pay hike for 18 years, since November 2006.
This spring the council voted again. In May, all five members, including Sher, Orozco and Rodin, approved a 5% raise to $892.50 a month. That rate starts after the Nov. 3 election.
City minutes also show all three voted for sewer rate increases in 2024 and 2025. They voted for parks and recreation fee increases in 2025 and 2026. Sher missed a 2024 parks fee vote.
The council itself didn’t vote on the latest water rates. The Ukiah Valley Water Authority’s executive committee set them in March. Orozco serves on that committee. In February, he moved to have staff draft the new rates, and in March he voted for them. Sher and Rodin don’t serve on it.
Only one of the four meetings the mailer cites, Feb. 7, 2024, holds a vote it describes. Another, Feb. 9, 2026, was a water authority hearing, not a council meeting.
Sher answered each charge in an email Monday. “The City Council had not voted to raise its salary since 2006,” she wrote. She takes home about $700 a month. That’s “approximately $6 an hour for the time I put in,” she said.


Orozco said in a phone interview Monday that the votes all happened at public meetings. “It didn’t happen behind doors, you know. This is a public meeting. This is public information,” he said.
People who are surprised by the raise “never attend meetings,” he said, and “everybody had the opportunity to say, no, we don’t want that.”
Ukiah raised water rates 6%, Sher said, then 4% a year for three more years. She said that was the smallest increase among the agencies in the Ukiah Valley Water Authority. Redwood Valley’s rates rose 30% at first, and Willow’s rose 19%.
The city raised electric rates in 2024 as energy prices climbed, she said. Its rates still average 48% below other utilities in the county. Many parks and recreation fees hadn’t gone up in 10 years, she said. Families who can’t pay can still get discounts.
Outside money
Sher said she’d never heard of Rescue California Coalition and has had no contact with it. “I have never seen an out-of-the-area organization pour money into a local election,” she said.

She said she wasn’t surprised Liberty was behind it. She said his goal “appears to be to sabotage the efforts of the City of Ukiah to improve the lives of our residents if those efforts do not benefit him financially.” She asked the challengers to say whether they approve of the mailer or condemn it.
Rodin called it “dark money.”
“The injection of dark money into this election by an out-of-town political action committee that is funded by Ross Liberty and other far-right interests debases our local election process,” she wrote.
All eight candidates for the three seats filed a state form. On it, each said they expect to raise and spend less than $2,000 this year. The committee spent nearly three times that against the incumbents. Sher said she wonders whether every candidate is staying under that mark. “While likely not illegal, Mr. Liberty’s funding of this mailer seems to be a cagey way of getting around those limits,” she said.
Ukiah’s $200 limit
Ukiah’s campaign law limits donations to $200 per person in an election year. The limit covers donations to candidates. It also covers donations to committees “established primarily to make independent expenditures in a city election.” Rescue California Coalition signed up with the state in March as a general-purpose committee.
The committee’s biggest donors gave $49,500 each. Among them are Tyler and Cameron Winklevoss, the New York investors best known for suing Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg.
Liberty, Orozco and the committee didn’t answer emails sent Saturday.
The election is Nov. 3. The other candidates are Robert Bazzani, Matt Froneberger, John Strangio, Mia Uribe and Sean White.

If anyone thinks going from $490 to $850 is robbery than you should looks at the BOS wages inside the county.
Grocery prices only went up 35-40% in the last three years…along with everything else…
The flyer was very effective at solidifying my view that Ross Liberty is a POS
Robert Bazzani’s campaign message is “trust me bro, I’ve got concepts of a plan” so it’s no wonder that he needs help from wealthy donors to stand a chance.
So true! The guy is a clown. I saw him posting campaign videos to his supporters while driving with his two little kids in the back seat… like really??? He’s a “useful idiot” for people like Ross Liberty to take advantage of. Really hoping Ukiah politics can overcome this!
Well, correct me if I’m wrong, but my understanding is that he would be the first very fancy lad ever to serve on the Ukiah City Council. That would be a civil rights triumph! I would want to be sure he has time to devote to informing himself on City issues, given that he must spend 4-6 hours per day on his hair and zhuzhing his outfits.
So an anonymous complaint about a candidate complaining that a local person spent money to support them through an outside committee isn’t a little sus? How do we know this isn’t one of the incumbents? I think Robert already had a decent chance even though incumbents have a built-in advantage, none of whom have actually done much to solve any of the problems Ukiah has despite their prior years of service. (Voters can be superficial and Robert is the cutest candidate so he ahs that going for him.) Many voters prefer trying out someone new over recycling the same people who have been there just because they have experience when that experience hasn’t been particularly good or effective. Voters know for sure what kinds of things they will do because of their voting records (e.g., increase fees and increase their own pay). The flyers were factually accurate except for some of the meeting dates and the flyers’ sponsor was disclosed with the donor information also available to anyone who wants to look at it.
I’m sure Ross Liberty thought he could fly under the radar by funding this hit piece through a dark money right wing PAC. Council Members Rodin, Sher and Orozco simply refuse to serve the special interests of Mr. Liberty and his wealthy Mendo Matters pals–who seem to be backing the Strangio, Bazzani, Froneberger slate. Let’s keep ugly, negative politicking out of our local elections. Keep Ukiah moving in a positive direction!
The Ross Liberty mailer was clearly designed to smear the three incumbent Ukiah City Council members. The increase in pay looks bad until you see the actual figures. These City Council reps are getting enough to barely live on, by today’s standards, $892.50 before taxes, even after two raises. The raises to the cost of providing services are reflective of this terrible Republican economy we are all suffering through. I also object to the headline of this article, which is a click bait re-stating of the main smear printed on the mailer. I would hope The Voice puts out yet another article, providing a list of the great things that have happened in Ukiah under the guidence of these three candidates. I am not a resident of Ukiah, but my children and grandchildren are, and I am proud to be associated with this great small town.
Right, and no increase in compensation in 18 years. There was some catching up to do in terms of cost of living increases over those years. And the council is still below what the legislature allows for council members in cities of 35,000 or less.
While I was also against the annexation, the raise increase seems reasonable. Their last increase was in 2006, 18 years ago for gods sake. Looking at the rates of inflation over that time period, it doesn’t seem at all over the top. More troubling is the way it was said by the shady Rescue California Coalition, Escondido CA. By omitting facts they showed a very different picture of what really happened. And why is an Escondido organization sticking their fingers into Ukiah’s business? Might be interesting to start following that and see where it leads.
At least one posible reason for the Escondido organization involving itself in a small city’s council election is stated right there in the article:
“On Oct. 9, the [Rescue California Coaltion] got $5,000 from Ukiah businessman Ross Liberty. It reported the donation to the state the next day.
On Oct. 12, the [Rescue California Coaltion] spent $1,907.33 on a mailer against each incumbent: Sher, Juan Orozco and Mari Rodin. That’s $5,721.99 in all.”
Editor–
The scummies postmarked from Escondido (600 miles south of Ukiah) have given the 5 aspirants to replacing the 3 incumbents for our Ukiah Cuty Council a perfect chance to signal their civic virtue: Each of the 5 should make a public statement that, if elected, they will donate the pay raise due (first in 18 years) to a certified 501 (c)3 charitable organization of their choice. – We voters will trust them, but will verify their pledges.
I didn’t hide my position on annexation and it seems pretty clear if we keep the same City Council we will be facing another go at annexation no matter what we the people want. They pulled out because the City Manager’s “hypothetical” offer to carve me out of I would sit it out didn’t fly. Those City Council members know I’m 16 months ago diagnosed with mesothelioma. Waiting me out might not be too difficult. And it does make Mari’s claim that I have financial motives a bit far fetched, I can tell you, money is not a motivator these days.
I’m hopeful folks look at how staff and the City Council that employs them did not care what people thought of annexation.
How much money did you make while not consulting the public around the Amazon facility you were instrumental in bringing here into the community?
After reading the article, it’s clear to me that the flyer was disingenuous. You can disagree with annexation and criticize how the council handled community engagement without suggesting the incumbents don’t care about Ukiah or the greater valley.
Highlighting a 73% pay increase while leaving out that it amounted to $360 a month—the first increase in 18 years—paints a deliberately misleading picture. If your objection is to annexation, make that case on its merits. Disagreeing with the council’s decisions doesn’t justify misrepresenting its record.
Ross, one wonders why you resorted to dissing the incumbents with a deceptive mailer rather than trumpet the merits of the candidates you are promoting. Enough said.
Thank you for your service