Ripe dark grape clusters hang heavy at Whaler Vineyard on Old River Road in Ukiah, Calif., on Tuesday, Sept. 25, 2018, before the vines came out at the Mendocino vineyard. The 34-acre estate listed at $3.495 million in 2022 and closed at $1.685 million. (Mendocino Winegrowers Inc. via Bay City News)

MENDOCINO CO., 4/23/26 — Drive north through Hopland this spring, past Ukiah into Redwood Valley. You’ll notice gaps. Where Cabernet and Zinfandel twisted toward the sun last October, now there’s bare dirt, stacked rootstock, maybe even a For Sale sign. Growers across California are pulling vines at a pace nobody alive has seen. Nowhere is the identity question sharper than in Mendocino County, where wine has been a way of life for four generations.

This isn’t a story about oversupply. That’s the symptom. This is about what happens to a place when the crop that defined it starts to disappear.

By the numbers

How much vineyard has California lost? Somewhere around 38,000 acres ripped out in the last two years, depending on who’s counting. Wine industry groups say pulling another 40,000 would finally bring supply and demand back into balance. That’s a lot of bare dirt.

Counties on the North Coast: Napa 3,117 acres removed, Sonoma 2,711, Mendocino 832, Lake 777. Mendocino has far less total acreage than its neighbors, but those 832 acres hit harder. They’re concentrated around Ukiah and Hopland, where the county’s identity as wine country is most visible.

That figure may be a floor. Bernadette Byrne, who ran Mendocino Winegrowers Inc. for years and owned Sip! Mendocino in Hopland, says the growers she talks to think the real number is higher. “Everybody I talk to has got a different story about whether that’s true,” she said. “But in general, there seems to be consensus that it’s actually a lot more.”

The 2025 California crush came in at 2.6 million tons, the lightest since 1999. Rob McMillan’s Silicon Valley Bank report sees 2027–2028 as a bumpy bottom, recovery as slow. Byrne put it more bluntly: “I don’t see this as a typical agricultural boom or bust cycle. I see this as a transitionary cycle where the industry is changing.”

What happens to the land?

Near Ukiah, the Whaler Vineyard estate — 34 acres, roughly 28 planted — got pulled and sold in November 2025 for $1.685 million. The property listed at $3.495 million in March 2022 and closed at under $50,000 an acre.

Byrne said planted vines have flipped from asset to obstacle. “Some [owners] are finding that if they actually want to sell the land, they have to take out the vineyards — to make them more approachable or accessible for people, because people don’t want that overhead, that liability of having to farm grapes.”

Rich Parducci stands among the vines at Whaler Vineyard on Old River Road in Ukiah, Calif., on July 6, 2022. The estate was pulled and sold in November 2025 for under $50,000 an acre. (Lark Coryell via Bay City News)

Rich Parducci, a fourth-generation winemaker and owner of McNab Ridge Winery, sourced Whaler’s Cabernet for years. “Fantastic fruit,” he said. “Small berries that packed an intense flavor — black cherry, specifically — great tannin structure and color.” Russ Nyborg, Whaler’s owner, “did an amazing job” with the estate’s Zinfandel and Syrah too, Parducci said. “They were true stewards of the land.”

Parducci didn’t know the vineyard was coming out until right before it happened: “Sad to see it go unpicked. Surely not the ending the family had envisioned or hoped for.” McNab Ridge’s 2020 Family Reserve “Largo” Cabernet — 32½ percent Whaler fruit — is the last wine from that vineyard. Just under one pallet remains.

Byrne saw it from her window in Hopland. A neighboring Cabernet ranch didn’t sell any grapes last year. Part of it is cattle pasture now. Along the 101 corridor and Highway 175, she sees wholesale clearing on larger properties. But the smaller growers aren’t making dramatic moves. “The small old Mendocino growers, I don’t think they’re pulling out gracefully,” she said. “I think they’re just limping along.”

Parducci put a number on it. Nothing less than $1,000 a ton pencils out, he said, “and that’s if you’re farming at five tons to the acre or more.” Even Napa Cabernet goes for a fraction of what it fetched four years ago. “If you don’t have a home for it, you probably shouldn’t put it in the bottle.”

And even when growers are able to sell, the math moves against them. Lorenzo Pacini, a Mendocino grower and chair of the winegrowers’ grower committee, which helps members of the group market their grapes, said the squeeze comes from both directions: “Even if you can sell your grapes for the same price as or a higher price than last year, you might not turn a profit because of the price of inputs.”

Most of McNab Ridge’s growers keep farming anyway. “If you don’t farm it, you’re guaranteed not to sell it,” Parducci pointed out. “Fortunately many of our growers have other full-time jobs, which allows them to maintain their vineyards while still earning income.”

The abandonment problem

AB 732, effective Jan. 1, 2026, gives county agricultural commissioners leverage over pest-ridden nuisance blocks. That leverage is financial, and it can add up: $500 per acre initially, rising to $1,000 if owners don’t act within 45 days. Mealybugs, leafhoppers, sharpshooters, powdery mildew, trunk disease — left unchecked, they spread.

Parducci gets the intent but calls it “akin to pouring salt in a wound.” And he has a theory as to what happens then: “Some of these growers can’t afford to take care of their vineyard, let alone pull it out, so we’re going to penalize them? Then, when they can’t pay the fine, I assume the government takes their property?”

Byrne added a point that gets less attention: pulling vines isn’t free either. “It costs a considerable amount of money to pull out vineyards,” she said. “It’s not a simple take a dozer out there and just let ‘er rip.” There are disposal regulations, burn-pile restrictions, and real costs. The result is a three-sided box: growers who can’t afford to farm also can’t afford to pull, and now they can’t afford to do nothing.

What worries Parducci most isn’t the pulling. “My only hope is that it doesn’t get turned into houses or some type of commercial property. Once that happens, it is probably lost as ag land forever.” Vineyards could become what is often called the Final Crop — houses.

The heritage question

Not all removals are equal. When the Barbieri Ranch in Russian River Valley — planted in 1905 — got sold to a real estate firm and ripped out, Carlisle Winery’s Mike Officer put it bluntly: “One hundred years of farming gone in a day.”

Parducci sees both sides. “Old vines produce great fruit, but unfortunately they don’t always produce a lot,” he said. “The price per ton needs to offset the lack of production, and in a down market it might be tough to find a buyer willing to pay top dollar.”

Some newer plantings feature unique varieties creating interest among younger drinkers “who want to discover new things.” But Pacini warned against chasing trends: “Chenin Blanc is incredibly popular right now. But if you were to plant Chenin Blanc this year, in five years it might have fallen out of favor.” New vines take five years to produce. The market moves faster than the vines.

Green grape clusters (pre-veraison) at Whaler Vineyard on Old River Road in Ukiah, Calif., during the growing season. Fourth-generation winemaker Rich Parducci sourced fruit here for years and called it “fantastic.” (Lark Coryell via Bay City News)

The generational weight

The Parducci name has been synonymous with Mendocino wine for four generations. Ask Parducci what his grandfather would make of today’s landscape, and he paused. “This would be a tough one for him to accept. He always felt bad when growers had to leave their crop on the vine.”

Then, quietly: “I miss him like crazy, but I am glad he’s not here to witness what is happening to the industry. I am not sure he would believe it.”

Even growers who can sell are getting ground down. “The cost to farm and the cost to actually produce a bottle of wine has continued to go up,” Byrne said. “Yet the marketplace hasn’t kept pace.” A local grower told her: “I used to love to farm, but now I’m in the office — dealing with water regulations, dealing with fees. It’s just not fun anymore.” That grower didn’t harvest all his grapes last year.

Looking ahead

At one time there were over 100 wineries in Mendocino County. Parducci thinks that number could drop to 70 or 75. “Hopefully the properties stay ag-focused, be it other crops — such as cannabis — or pasture land.”

He views Mendocino’s Largo area — the bench east of the Russian River — the way many view Rutherford or Oakville. “It just produces great Cabernet, the best in Mendocino County in my opinion.” That keeps him farming.

Pacini said the 2026 crop set looks small, which could speed the rebalancing. But the 40,000 acres Allied Winegrowers’ Jeff Bitter believes would bring balance haven’t all been pulled yet. Until they are, the gaps north of Hopland will keep growing. And the question Parducci keeps coming back to will only get louder: “When is this going to end?” 

Roger Coryell is a journalist with the Mendocino Voice and Bay City News, and founder of North and Vine, a wine-country marketing agency in Sonoma County. He was editor of the Sonoma County Gazette through its final edition in March 2026. He can be reached at roger@northandvine.net or (707) 892-3953.

Join the Conversation

19 Comments

  1. Now these Landowners around Ukiah wouldn’t mind getting a developer to buy their lots of land. I hope the city has a plan for the surrounding farm land for more a more robust City of Ukiah.

    1. Why? There’s plenty of road capacity for the traffic volume, especially at 55 MPH, and enough passing lanes for the folks who want to risk the ever-present speed traps.

    2. There will be fewer accidents with a broader normal size highway (w/ highway speeds @ 65mph and on and off ramps) to fill in the gap between Hopland and Ukiah.

  2. It’s tough to be a farmer in California these days… with neverending environmental and labor regs. Capitol expenditures for equipment replacing and increased annual costs. While income falls or is non-existent some years.
    Pror to AB732 existing statutes provide for pest abatement with the cost being a lien on the property. Usually a spray by a PCO …a temporary solution. Under AB732 a very large lien could accumulate in a short time.. leaving the grower in an impossible situation they don’t deserve. Adding more pressure to their all important bottom line.

    Ie
    C

  3. 1.Alcoholics Annonymous Ukiah Chapter: 707-462-7123
    2. The land will have a break from pesticides and herbicides. Would be interesting to see how long till the land tests free of atrazine.
    3. People need houses! So privilidged to sit in your hereditary family ranch houses with no neighbors, private ponds, irrigation water for green lawns, lamenting that someday the land might have houses for other people on it.
    4. What the Vineyard owners are feeling is what every home owner is feeling: stuck. No money to fix up in order to sell yet no money to pay the mortgage. Welcome! The government can’t give farmers welfare forever! After all, they might get dependent. (And yes! I’m being vindictive cause my republican old river road farming family was never into the government helping people. Pull yourself up by your bootstraps like the rest of us!)

  4. The Vineyards that were put in from the 1970s and later cause nothing but devastating damage to our property in Mendocino County. They literally came in and devastated the land by cutting down thousands of trees and flattening the land and digging it up so they could plant their Vineyards. All because California won an award for the number one wine in the world that year. Stupidest damn thing they could have let happen here in Mendocino County as far as I’m concerned. Their areas that literally were ripped apart and livestock taken out all for the almighty dollar! The Vineyards have sucked our water resources so badly that people wonder if they’ll be water for people and livestock left after they get through with it. Don’t get me wrong, I believe in watering crops that take care of the people but grape Vineyards are not one of them in Mendocino County. These are not grapes for the tables they are grapes for the wine and that’s it. All again, because of the Mighty Dollar and chasing after it.

  5. “Whaler Vineyard estate — 34 acres, roughly 28 planted — got pulled and sold in November 2025 for $1.685 million. The property listed at $3.495 million in March 2022 and closed at under $50,000 an acre.” This is another example of property value declines in Mendocino county. I am wondering if the property tax register represents reality or does the county now have the majority of rural property overvalued?

    1. The tax payer needs to find comparable property sales and apply for a prop 8 appeal to make their case with the assessor.

    2. Agreed. I wanted to buy The Whaler Ranch. Its beautiful, but the grapes were a liability and the house is actually quite dated with old fixtures and appliances. The pond had problems and the pool too. It’s just a house on some land at the end of the day, and it’s been sprayed with chemicals for generations.
      A good steward of the land means different things to different people. I think to alcohol grape growers it means taking care of your vines. If I had that land, I’d plant native trees, keep it limbed up and mowed like a beautiful park for my grandkids.
      Just because someone isn’t into agriculture , doesn’t mean the wouldn’t be good stewards of the land.

  6. You’d think this would make all the Republicans happy because it would mean less mexican migrants(farm workers) invading our towns with their scary foreign ways and words.
    Maybe farmers would have more community support if they actually hired the otherwise unemployed and hopeless local youth. Who else worked in the pear sheds growing up? No one but mexicans pack grapes now. And I love Mexicans, my kids are half mexican, so don’t go there. I’m just saying, if the farmers want our support then they’ve gotta include us in the food chain!!

  7. I don’t see how pests would be much of a problem if unused vineyards were grazed.
    Sonoma and Mendocino counties each used to have around 150,000 sheep until predators, mainly coyotes but also others, destroyed these businesses. Voters voted to prohibit effective coyote control such as the protection collars with a toxic bladder that sheep could wear. These collars killed coyotes when they bit it and were one of the last defenses taken away from sheep ranches. The grass is too sparse in much of Mendocino county to support cattle who are more predator resistant.

  8. I remember seeing fruit tree orchards being destroyed for vineyards all over Mendocino county & now, that money-focused ‘boom’ is a ‘bust’.
    One thing, not mentioned here, is the Canadian (& worldwide) boycott of American products, due to our present toxic regime. California wine has been a target of the boycott, which will likely put the ‘final nail in the coffin’ of the industry.
    Another example of how greed always destroys, eventually.

  9. It’s amazing how many people don’t understand basic economics. The wine industry brought in hundreds of millions of dollars in tax revenue for the county not just from wine sales but from the support industries selling goods and services to the local wine industry. When that goes away what will replace that tax revenues? Costco? Amazon? It’s a much more complex situation than most people realize. There is no industry in place to take over that burden. Mendocino County is dying and there is very few options to save it.

  10. FINALLY SOMEBODY WITH ENOUGH ECONOMIC SENSE GOT THE MESSAGE.
    This county needs agriculture.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *