(Illustration by Joe Dworetzky/Bay City News)

Dear Editor,

There are two distinct problems with the current decommissioning of Scott Dam and the destruction of Lake Pillsbury. First, the Pomo Potter Valley tribe was left out of the talks and water assignment, even though they have rights of lands back in 2007 that PG&E gave them along the Eel River watershed. But PG&E held onto the dam and watershed below the dam.

Has anyone questioned the legality of this exclusion, and the detriment, to their federal land trust granted by PG&E in the past? Can their lands be allotted water rights also?

Second, there is something called the Doctrine of Prior Appropriation. The Pomo of Potter Valley are a recognized water rights tribe, according to my reading on internet websites. They hold rights to keep their way of life alive, for agricultural purposes, or other fishing, hunting, recreation and ecosystems.

Scott Dam in Lake County, Calif., on May 9, 1967. Located on the Eel River creating Pillsbury Lake which has a surface area of 2,000 acres and 65 miles of shoreline. The concrete dam is an 138 feet in height and was built in 1922 for electricity and its owns by PG&E, who plans to give it up in 2022. (California Department of Water Resources via Bay City News)

I personally find the fact that the farmers of Potter Valley were also not included in discussions of water rights, since Doctrine of Prior Appropriation Rights has clearly been proven, showing the water from the Potter Valley Project has been utilized in very beneficial ways for over 100 years. 

Lake Pillsbury is the giver of life for the Potter Valley tribe and Potter Valley farmers. It is a natural fire suppression resource and a lifeline for Russian River ecosystems existing today. Why are the rights of these people being ignored, neglected and not legally adhered to? 

Catherine Lair
Ukiah

Join the Conversation

4 Comments

  1. I believe as I stated in an email to this newspaper a week ago. The entity that is interested in the Potter Valley Dam has to do with providing a Data Center either with electricity or water. I would think it has more to do with the water rights. And the other person who expressed that the water rights are fathered in is right. Have someone check with State Water Department. When we had a problem with water rights, the State filed in the Courthouse that we had the Rights to water in question. Perhaps that is what needs to be done sooner rather than later.

    1. We all use water to cool Google servers just by virtue of this article being online

    1. Doesn’t sound like it. Just my opinion. I believe Round Valley Tribes have been working to find an appropriate action on this problematic PG&E infrastructure for quite a while and most of the local reestablished tribes were not concerned with the dams or diversion during that time. Gaming was their focus.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *