(Illustration by Joe Dworetzky/Bay City News)
(Illustration by Joe Dworetzky/Bay City News)

When I first registered to vote, I registered as a Democrat. I was young, and I cared deeply about people and the world around me. I saw the Democratic Party as the one that stood up for the underdog — minorities, low-income families, women, children and the environment.

I’ve always known that programs like food stamps and subsidized housing have been misused by some. But I believed — and still do — that we shouldn’t dismantle programs that serve a vital purpose just because of a few bad actors. Eliminating these resources only punishes the children and families who truly need them.

I admired powerful women who broke barriers, most of whom were Democrats — women fighting for gender equality and civil rights. And as I’ve gotten older, those core values remain important to me. But I now see things with more perspective.

In my younger years, I was idealistic. I didn’t have children. I didn’t understand how complex economics, government spending, interest rates and inflation really are. Now, as a woman, a mother, a wife and a working professional, I’ve grown — and I’ve watched the Democratic Party change, too.

They still claim to fight for the underdog, but in practice, that no longer seems true. I live in Mendocino County, one of the most impoverished counties in California. We face high rates of poverty, child abuse, drug addiction and declining job opportunities. And yet, the very party that claims to care about people continues to push policies that hurt our communities.

Of course, I want a better future for my kids. Of course, I want to protect the environment. But there is no future without water. There is no future without jobs. There is no future without affordable housing — not just for low-income families, but for teachers, police officers, nurses and others essential to a healthy community.

Yet the Democratic Party supports removing two dams that provide critical water through local reservoirs (Lake Pillsbury and Lake Mendocino) — all in the name of environmental protection. This decision risks creating more water scarcity, displacing farmers and deepening poverty. Generations of families stand to lose their land and livelihoods.

Why? Why is this being allowed to happen? Why can’t there be a balanced solution — one that respects both environmental conservation and the immediate needs of the people who live here?

Low water levels due to the drought at the north ramp at Lake Mendocino, a large reservoir in Mendocino County, Calif., northeast of Ukiah on October 13, 2021. The lake and dam provide flood control, water conservation, hydroelectric power, and recreation. (Florence Low/California Department of Water Resources via Bay City News)

Yes, restoring steelhead populations is important. But so is protecting the lives and livelihoods of hundreds of thousands of people. People must come first. The fish can wait — especially since it’s been over a hundred years, and a new ecosystem has already been established in Lake Pillsbury that would be destroyed by dam removal. A fish ladder could be built instead, providing a compromise that supports both ecological and human needs.

Instead of creating more water scarcity, driving down home values due to lack of water, and pushing more families toward homelessness, maybe the Democratic Party should reconsider its priorities — and put blue-collar working people first. Maybe they’ll recognize that what’s happening here is simply wrong.

But I’ve lost hope.

I’ve followed the Potter Valley Project and the proposed dam removals closely. The current plan for pumping water to Lake Mendocino is, at best, haphazard. Even in wet years, projections show the lake will run dry eight out of every ten years. That is not a solution.

At this point, federal intervention — through eminent domain — is the only real option left. I can only hope that Secretary Brooke Rollins, Secretary Doug Burgum, and President Donald Trump step in and fight for our water, because the Democrats clearly will not.

They have made their choice: they care more about fish than about people. They have abandoned the people of California.

In the last couple of years, I have re-registered as a Republican. I feel abandoned by the Democratic Party. They no longer care about the working-class people who simply want a stable, decent life — and who work hard for what little they have.

Join the Conversation

8 Comments

  1. I feel that neither party cares ! Democrats fight for Medicare social security and programs we pay into. I feel like we could solve the solution to the dam by a new fish ladder. We have come along on technology and scientific and know there is a better solution! I am a farmer and will be hurt by this! I want the dams in
    Place! I blame pg& e and corporate greed. They create more problems. The removal screws us all the way to Marin. Jared Huffman is ridiculous on this matter. We need to get the infrastructure out there. Mendocino and Lake county should join forces and take over the project!

  2. Wasting a billion dollars of tax payers money to rehabilitate 100 year old dams built on a fault line so a handful of wealthy lake house owners can drive their boats around and the wine industry can continue to get free water is hardly the solution blue collar workers need. This isn’t about fish, it’s about a big fat bailout for the wine industry from Santa Trump.

  3. I agree the Democratic Party doesn’t fight for the working class like they should. But these dams aren’t worth it anymore, particularly for the working class (few workers benefit from them). It’s such a strange hill to die on that I question the legitimacy of your information sources.

    Not to mention, the laughability of joining the GOP at a time when they’re stomping out the working class everywhere, *especially* the farmers for whom you mourn.

  4. PGnE is not renewing its federal license for the operation of their dams. All affected parties had monthly meetings for years and worked hard to find a solution. Democrats and republicans had little to nothing to do with the dam removal. But democrats cannot force a corporation to keep operating the dams. I believe we all need to work together to help find a solution to the loss of the PVP. That would be a great place to put our energy.

  5. Did AI write that? What a partisan stretch to go from Lake Pillsbury dam removal to Yay MAGA. Trump and Voight are dismantling The New Deal established because America was only 15% Middle Class before The New Deal. MAGA elites wants to go back to that because it was so GREAT for the Republican Oligrachy. When the rural Sutter Hospital in N Lakeport closes so Republican billionaires can have their tax cut, will you still claim the Republicans care about America’s shrinking middle class?

    1. No, AI did not write that—but I’ll take it as a compliment.
      I don’t believe I came across as “Yay MAGA.” I was simply stating that the current administration may be the last resort to address the issue of the Dams. Both Secretary Rollins and Secretary Burgum are aware of the situation and attended a meeting about it in early September, which is why I mentioned them.
      I understand that mentioning President Trump—or even sharing that I’ve recently registered as a Republican—can be triggering for some, regardless of context. I’ve never claimed to be a Trump supporter. I’m simply deeply disheartened by the current direction of the Democratic Party. I recognize that you may feel differently, and that’s okay.
      That said, I completely agree with you: Lake County, California’s third most impoverished county, should not lose its hospital due to Medicaid cuts.
      I didn’t write this letter to debate party platforms or every policy disagreement between Democrats and Republicans. My main point is the urgent water crisis and the existential threat posed by the dam removals. Lake County is projected to lose roughly a million dollars a year in tourism revenue as a result. For a county that’s already struggling, that loss is significant. And that is only Lake County.
      The State should care. That’s the point I’m trying to make.

      Democrats run the State of California. They could stop this, but they don’t want to. Leaving impoverished areas even more vulnerable.

      Lake County is against the removal of the Dams as well: https://www.lakecountyca.gov/1859/Lake-Pillsbury

      Jared Huffman has secured funds for the Dam removal: https://www.watereducation.org/aquafornia-news/huffman-secures-15-million-eel-river-dam-removal-and-russian-river-diversion-plan#:~:text=Rosa%2C%20Calif.)-,Huffman%20secures%20$15%20million%20for%20Eel%20River%20Dam%20removal%20and,hydroelectric%20dams%20might%20shut%20down

      Gavin Newsom supports removing Scott Dam and Cape Horn Dam – he wants to process to be expedited. https://caltrout.org/news/governor-newsom-tours-caltrout-projects-and-releases-new-salmon-strategy

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *